Sustaining and Embedding Innovations - wiki JISC Sustaining and Embedding Innovations / Influencing organisational change
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Whenever you search in PBworks, Dokkio Sidebar (from the makers of PBworks) will run the same search in your Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, Gmail, and Slack. Now you can find what you're looking for wherever it lives. Try Dokkio Sidebar for free.

View
 

Influencing organisational change

This section focuses on:

 

  • Identifying who can influence and facilitate change.
  • Setting innovations within the context of institutional goals, drivers and needs.
  • Adopting a Continuous Improvement approach – akin to action research.
  • Setting up internal networks to link change agents/champions.
  • Adopting partnership working.

 

Key points for creating appropriate organisational structures:

 

  • Institutions should engage in dialogue over “educational futures” – examining a range of future scenarios for the education sector – helping them to create appropriate organisational structures to meet such futures.
  • Institutions should consider setting individual project innovations within a context of overall (and cyclical) continuous improvement – where there is a focus on addressing key institutional/local goals, drivers and needs (the “big picture”), embedding and “joining up” innovations and reviewing/reflecting on the impact of the innovations – akin to action research.
  • Innovation project teams do not always have the motivation or wherewithal to take responsibility for embedding innovations, therefore project teams need to transfer “ownership” of their innovations.
  • Change agents (or champions) in a devolved model can take on ownership and responsibility for facilitating uptake of innovations.
  • Heads of faculties/schools/departments are key stakeholders in regards to embedding innovations as they can set direction and allocate time and resource – innovation project teams therefore need to convince and motivate them to adopt their innovations.
  • Networks need to be set up in an institution to support communication between change agents/champions in order to facilitate sharing of ideas, knowledge and expertise between faculties/schools/departments.
  • Service departments, such as e-learning, blended learning, MIS departments should consider adopting a true “partnership” approach with academics/teaching staff in order to facilitate the uptake of innovations. This partnership approach should also apply to inter-working between service departments, where “turf wars” can block co-operative working. Critical to developing such partnerships are (a) developing a common language, (b) overcoming traditional “master/slave” relationships and (c) creating win-win goals/activities.

 

Key Resources:

Change Management infoKit

Strategy infoKit

Process Review infoKit